Skip to main content

david lynch task - julian

 How David Lynch uses film techniques to portray ordinary life as nightmarish?

In the film, 'the grandmother' David lynch uses real life scenarios, but then twists and makes the situation very eerie and almost imaginary. For example, the first instance this happened in was when the child was born. He was born almost in a way that a plant grows, although the audience knows that he is a human and not a plant, this makes things kind of nightmarish as it seems like 2 scenarios, in this case being a child's birth and the growth of a plant, are combined together when they shouldn't be, and this sort of imaginary scenes would happen in ones dream. Another way this binding of a action and another action which are not related to each other is when the family are all on all 4's and are barking like dogs. Although it's meant to be scary, it seems on the whacky side of the spectrum, which is another reason why the film seems very nightmarish, because things are happening that are not meant to happen.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CONNECT SHORT FILM ANALYSIS - JULIAN

Connect explores how imagination and emotion binds in with the real life, one major factor that shows this is when the camera shows all of the civilians faces on the bus by uing close hand held shots. When the camera zooms in on their faces they look emotionless, almost as if they are disjointed from reality, from the real world. This could be because they are imagining certain things and feeeling emotion on the inside. When the girl puts in her headphones as the music fades in she also zones out and starts imagining things primarily being shown that as soon as she zones out all of a sudden the businessman assassinates the old lady to take her seat, but then the girl zones back in so the music is stopped and the scenery is back to normal.
Post a Comment
Read more

No country for old men, ending questions - David

  Do you find the ending of the film to be satisfying resolution ?  Why ? I do find the ending to be satisfying, as i feel like the ending was very different and took a different turn from other movies in general or movies of this genre. One main difference was the fact that the main character Llewellyn Moss died when the film was building up to one big final duel between him and Anton Chigurh however, moss died off screen by people not even related to Chigurh and it was very anti climatic. As well as this happening, there was another difference, because this death should of led to Sheriff En Tom bell taking over as the main hero figure. However, he didn't and he decided to step down from being in the law. This was because all this .new wave' of crime wasn't suited to him
Post a Comment
Read more

January Mock Exam Question 2021

Question ' The director is the most important creative influence on the production and content of a film '.     How far do you agree with this statement when applied to both of your chosen films ?   Films chosen: -Casablanca -Apocalypse now  Answer: I somewhat agree with this statement as Directors are seen as the lead role off-camera when a movie is in production. Michael Curtz (Director of Casablanca) and Francis Ford Coppola (Director of Appocolypse now) are the main reasons why both of the films recieved the attention and criticism it deserved.  An introduction to this point is the era of film making, 'new hollywood'. Links to our point as one of the most controversial films out of the 2 chosen was made in the middle of this era; Apocalypse Now (1979). In fact this film was released 1 year before 'New Hollywood' started to end, however it was in production for 3 years and it was set to release on Coppola's 38th birthday, April 7 1977. Compared to this, ...
Post a Comment
Read more