Skip to main content

One Week and The Scarecrow analysis

 

BUSTER KEATON : 'One Week' and 'The Scarecrow' analysis.


Use of Film  Form
- Buster is not really known for cuts in his editing in his short films. However in the scarecrow,  there are many, more than usual. This is because of the scene where buster is being chased by the dog. Dogs are clearly faster than humans so in the film he has to cut each shot to make the dog chase seem long , funny and entertaining. He does this by running out of shot, around corners and then cutting the shot to new scenery.

mostly long shots (to frame large scale stunts, set pieces and gags); especially in One Week

-exaggerated performances

-long takes (to display large scale stunts, set pieces and gags in their entirety)

-mostly invisible editing


Buster Keaton's film persona

In one week, Buster Keaton already HAS a love where as in Scarecrow, he is looking for his love and keeps failing.
Another persona is in the scene where he is trying to have a posh dinner party, trying to 'fit in’
-working class/rural American

-relatable everyman

-aspirational/American dream

-clumsy/eccentric

-outsider

-hopeless romantic 

Representations:

-traditional/outdated gender roles

•man does hard, blue collar work as wife supports him/does more "feminine work"

•man must fend off rival suitor for wife's hand/love


-hard-working blue collar working class

•builder in One Week, farmer in The Scarecrow

Silent Comedy Techniques:

-Large scale stunts/action scenes at climax

•house spinning in "One Week", and chase in "The Scarecrow"


-slapstick comedy through exaggerated performance, set-up and pay-off

-post-modern techniques

•fourth wall break in "One Week"; cameraman covers lens in order not to expose nudity when woman in bath reaches down to pick up soap

 Cultural Contexts and References:

-opposed to capitalist modernisation/skeptical of industrial revolution

•mocks the idea of a build-it-yourself house kit

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CONNECT SHORT FILM ANALYSIS - JULIAN

Connect explores how imagination and emotion binds in with the real life, one major factor that shows this is when the camera shows all of the civilians faces on the bus by uing close hand held shots. When the camera zooms in on their faces they look emotionless, almost as if they are disjointed from reality, from the real world. This could be because they are imagining certain things and feeeling emotion on the inside. When the girl puts in her headphones as the music fades in she also zones out and starts imagining things primarily being shown that as soon as she zones out all of a sudden the businessman assassinates the old lady to take her seat, but then the girl zones back in so the music is stopped and the scenery is back to normal.

City Of God Openening scene analysis

  City Of God Openening scene analysis Through photography, mise-en-scene, sound, and editing, City Of God conveys the concepts of disorder and anarchy in the favella to the audience. This is demonstrated in the first scene, when the gang is chasing the chicken. The first thing we see in the movie, for example, is a knife being sharpened against a stone. Knives are normally hazardous things, and the fact that it is being sharpened against a stone suggests a barbaric lifestyle: this is foreshadowing Lil Z's brutal lifestyle, which he imposes on his gang through proxy. This quickly builds suspense and makes the spectator question the characters' motives. The editing heightens the suspense by using almost whiplash-inducing, flashing cuts between the knife and the dark screen, reinforcing the sense of urgency. Normally, a barbecue would be a joyful, tranquil, and familiar sight; but, the tight camera angles and fast cuts disrupt this. The sequence cuts back and forth between sever...

No country for old men, ending questions - David

  Do you find the ending of the film to be satisfying resolution ?  Why ? I do find the ending to be satisfying, as i feel like the ending was very different and took a different turn from other movies in general or movies of this genre. One main difference was the fact that the main character Llewellyn Moss died when the film was building up to one big final duel between him and Anton Chigurh however, moss died off screen by people not even related to Chigurh and it was very anti climatic. As well as this happening, there was another difference, because this death should of led to Sheriff En Tom bell taking over as the main hero figure. However, he didn't and he decided to step down from being in the law. This was because all this .new wave' of crime wasn't suited to him